Foundations + institutions · Week 04
Debrief the fishing game, then build the institutional toolkit
Start with the evidence from Classwork 3. Then begin Lecture 4 at page 17 and apply its ideas to a new shared-aquifer case in Classwork 4.
Sep 14–18Classwork 3 → Lecture 4 (p. 17) → Classwork 4TL Ch. 2
Focus
- Evidence from the Classwork 3 fishing experiment
- Property rights, public goods, and open access
- Liability, regulation, incentives, and transaction costs
Prepare
- Revisit your Classwork 3 choices and group record
- Read TL Chapter 2
- Bring one explanation for a difference across settings
Practice
- Compare catches, dock prices, and fish left
- Identify who may use, exclude, transfer, monitor, and enforce
- Design pumping and information rules for a shared aquifer
Guiding question
What did the fishing experiment reveal about incentives—and which institutions can make resource users face the consequences of their choices?
Learning targets
- Interpret differences across the five fishing settings without treating them as clean causal estimates.
- Distinguish private, common, public, and open-access resource regimes.
- Explain why open access dissipates rent and why public goods tend to be underprovided.
- Add individual marginal benefits vertically to value a public good.
- Design a resource institution while accounting for monitoring, transaction costs, and fairness.
Week rhythm
| Date | Work |
|---|---|
| Mon · Sep 14 | Classwork 3 debrief, then begin Lecture 4 |
| Wed · Sep 16 | Property rights, public goods, and open access |
| Fri · Sep 18 | Classwork 4: designing rules for a shared aquifer |
Lecture slides
TipLecture slide shortcuts
Click inside a slide preview, then use:
- ←/→ or ↑/↓ to move through the slides;
- M to open the menu;
- F to enter fullscreen;
- E to enter or exit PDF export mode;
- Ctrl + Shift + F to search the slides;
- T to switch between light and dark mode; and
- Esc to exit the menu or fullscreen.
This week’s materials
Coming next
Week 5 moves from static resource allocation to choices through time: benefit-cost analysis, present value, and dynamic efficiency.